The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1037•Gwendolyn Dianne Wilkes v. State of North Carolina
20-1037Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1037
GWENDOLYN DIANNE WILKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
PEOPLE IMPROVING PERPETUITY, a/k/a PIP,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00699-LCB-LPA)
Submitted: August 27, 2020 Decided: September 16, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gwendolyn Dianne Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Dianne Wilkes appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Wilkes’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Wilkes v. North Carolina, No. 1:19-cv-00699-LCB-LPA (M.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2019). We
deny Wilkes’s motions to be placed in the witness protection program, for immediate
testing, and for a writ of quo warranto. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.