The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1105•Derrick Allen v. Ted Wire
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1105
DERRICK ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TED WIRE; ERIK MCCONCHIE, General Manager; WILL AUSTIN, Kitchen
Manager; DAVE SIGUMUND, Kitchen Manager; CASEY HUMPHRIES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00689-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Asa Covington Edwards, IV, MAGINNIS
LAW, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Allen has noted an appeal in the civil action he filed in the district court.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because the district
court has not entered a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, this
appeal is interlocutory. Accordingly, we deny Allen’s motion to appoint counsel and
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.