The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1153•Joshua Fuller-Deets v. National Institutes of Health
20-1153Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1153
JOSHUA FULLER-DEETS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:18-cv-03175-GJH)
Submitted: February 5, 2021 Decided: March 24, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Fuller-Deets, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Fuller-Deets appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) on Fuller-Deets’ complaint challenging NIH’s
prohibition against bringing a service dog-in-training to his job on the NIH campus. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Fuller-Deets v. National Institutes of Health,
No. 8:18-cv-03175-GJH (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.