The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1174•Steven Martynuska v. Bww Law Group, LLC; Jon Doe 1-20
20-1174Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1174
STEVEN MARTYNUSKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BWW LAW GROUP, LLC; JON DOE 1-20,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00660-DKC)
Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Martynuska, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Martynuska appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martynuska v. BWW Law Grp., LLC,
No. 1:19-cv-00660-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2020). We deny Martynuska’s motion to
appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.