The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1183•Nelson L. Bruce v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, a/k/a PenFed Credit Union
20-1183Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1183
NELSON L. BRUCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a/k/a PenFed Credit Union,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:17-cv-02170-BHH)
Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 22, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nelson L. Bruce, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. Graziano, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN
& MELLOTT, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nelson L. Bruce appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion seeking relief from the court’s prior order denying both his motion to compel
arbitration and a separate Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bruce
v. Pentagon Fed. Credit Union, No. 2:17-cv-02170-BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 29, 2020). We deny
Bruce’s motion to transfer this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.