The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1327•In re: SYED ASKRI v. JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, U.S. Trustee, Trustee -
20-1327Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1327
In re: SYED ASKRI,
Debtor.
------------------------------------
SYED ASKRI,
Debtor – Appellant,
v.
JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III, U.S. Trustee,
Trustee – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-01196-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 27, 2020
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Syed Askri, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Michael Bernstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Syed Askri appeals from the district court’s order: (1) affirming the bankruptcy
court’s order converting his Chapter 11 proceeding to one under Chapter 7 and (2)
dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his disclosure statement.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Askri v. Fitzgerald, No. 1:19-cv-01196-TSE-IDD (E.D.
Va. Feb 18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.