The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1330•Luis Francisco Ramos v. Defense Commissary Agency
20-1330Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1330
LUIS FRANCISCO RAMOS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; LINDA
RUFFIN; KIMBERLY VARTANIAN; HILDEGARD FOSSETT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:18-cv-00380-BO)
Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Francisco Ramos, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Luis Francisco Ramos appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 for
failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramos v. Def. Commissary Agency, No.
5:18-cv-00380-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.