The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1354•In re: James M. Preston
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1354
In re: JAMES M. PRESTON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv-00114-TSK-MJA)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: July 7, 2021
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James M. Preston, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James M. Preston petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court has granted Preston’s petition. Preston v.
Gomez, No. 1:19-cv-00114-TSK-MJA (N.D.W. Va. May 7, 2021). Accordingly, we deny
the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.