The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1416•Marilyn Jackson v. CHRISTOPHER C. MILLER, Acting Secretary, Department of Defense
20-1416Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1416
MARILYN JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER C. MILLER, Acting Secretary, Department of Defense,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00659-LO-TCB)
Submitted: November 13, 2020 Decided: December 2, 2020
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amos N. Jones, AMOS JONES LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. G. Zachary
Terwilliger, United States Attorney, Hugham Chan, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marilyn Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendant in Jackson’s employment action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jackson v. Esper, No. 1:19-cv-00659-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 11 & 12, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.