The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1496•Lijo Panghat v. Department of Veterans Affairs; University of Maryland at Baltimore
20-1496Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1496
LIJO PANGHAT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT
BALTIMORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00994-ELH)
Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lijo Panghat, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Anne Bledsoe, Lillian Lane Reynolds,
Educational Affairs Division, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lijo Panghat appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Panghat v. Dep’t of
Veterans Affs., No. 1:19-cv-00994-ELH (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2019; filed Mar. 27, 2020 &
entered March 30, 2020). We deny Panghat’s motion for leave to submit newly discovered
evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.