The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1520•Christina M. Vogt v. Macy’s Inc.
20-1520Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1520
CHRISTINA M. VOGT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MACY’S INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:19-cv-00069-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 28, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christina M. Vogt, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Umberto Leonoro, STEPTOE & JOHNSON
PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christina M. Vogt appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion to
remand and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her civil action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vogt v. Macy’s
Inc., No. 3:19-cv-00069-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 17, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.