The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1545•Kenneth D. Franklin v. Joyce M. Anthony; Commonwealth of Virginia
20-1545Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1545
KENNETH D. FRANKLIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOYCE M. ANTHONY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:19-cv-00083-RBS-RJK)
Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Franklin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Franklin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Franklin’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s findings
regarding Eleventh Amendment immunity and supplemental jurisdiction, he has forfeited
appellate review of those issues.* See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* To the extent Franklin challenges the district court’s alternative determination that
he failed to establish diversity jurisdiction, we conclude that the district court did not err.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.