The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1565•Andrew U.d. Straw v. United States Department of State
20-1565Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1565
ANDREW U.D. STRAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02294-ELH)
Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew U.D. Straw, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew U.D. Straw appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
to the Defendant on Straw’s complaint alleging discrimination and violations of due
process. We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Straw v. U.S. Dep’t of State,
No. 1:19-cv-02294-ELH (D. Md. May 14, 2020). Although we recognize that no response
brief was filed, the Appellee was not required to file a response brief. 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Accordingly, we deny Straw’s motion for judicial notice and default judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.