The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1578•In re: Roy M. Belfast
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1578
In re: ROY M. BELFAST,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:18-cv-00453-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: October 15, 2020 Decided: October 19, 2020
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy M. Belfast, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roy M. Belfast petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment.
He seeks an order from this court directing the district court act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court has entered an order denying Belfast’s motion
and other associated motions. United States v. Belfast, No. 7:18-cv-00453-JLK-RSB
(W.D. Va. Sept. 1, 2020). Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.