The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1670•Mario Raneses Dagulo v. United States of America
20-1670Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 19, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1670
MARIO RANESES DAGULO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-00366-RGD-LRL)
Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mario Raneses Dagulo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mario Raneses Dagulo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in
which he alleged medical malpractice and violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a,
and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Dagulo v. United States, No. 2:18-cv-00366-RGD-LRL (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.