The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1693•Nathaniel Hampton Jones v. Grantham & Properties
20-1693Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1693
NATHANIEL HAMPTON JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GRANTHAM & PROPERTIES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (4:19-cv-00779-JMC)
Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Hampton Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Hampton Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and remanding his civil action to the Florence
County Court of Common Pleas. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Grantham &
Props., No. 4:19-cv-00779-JMC (D.S.C. June 12, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.