The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1731•Lisa Marie Kerr v. Marshall University Board of Governors
20-1731Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 28, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1731
LISA MARIE KERR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS; GENE BRETT KUHN;
JUDITH SOUTHARD; SANDRA BAILEY; TERESA EAGLE; LISA HEATON,
and; DAVID PITTENGER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-12333)
Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lisa Marie Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew P. Smith, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC,
Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lisa Marie Kerr appeals the district court’s order denying her motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60 for reconsideration and to reopen her dismissed civil action for fraud or,
alternatively, for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v.
Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors, No. 2:14-cv-12333 (S.D.W. Va. June 5, 2020). We deny
Kerr’s motion to disqualify and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.