The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1732•Karen Marie Seay v. United States of America
20-1732Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 19, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1732
KAREN MARIE SEAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00185-DJN)
Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karen Marie Seay, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Karen Marie Seay appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
Seay’s complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680,
for failure to comply with Virginia’s statutory requirements for bringing a medical
malpractice action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Seay v. United States,
No. 3:20-cv-00185-DJN (E.D. Va. July 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.