The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1786•Tacitus Anastacius Hall, a/k/a Tazz Hall v. TIMOTHY V. ANDERSON, HUD Commissioner & Anderson Law
20-1786Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 10, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1786
TACITUS ANASTACIUS HALL, a/k/a Tazz Hall,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY V. ANDERSON, HUD Commissioner & Anderson Law;
WILLIAM I.F. COLLINS; U. S. POSTAL SERVICE; HUD, United States
Housing & Urban Development; JAMES MATTHEWS; TRACY
THORNE-BEGLAND; JOHN MARSHALL CORPORATE WARD SYSTEMS;
CHARLENE WHITE, Circuit Clerk; DENISE HARRIS, Circuit Clerk; ELECTED
CIRCUIT CLERK JEWITT; METLIFE HOME LOANS/METLIFE BANK, N.A.;
HUD/TSS,LCC; VEPCO, d/b/a Dominion Energy; MANDI LOUPASSI; BETTER
HOUSING COALITION; HOMEWARD/CARITAS; RICHMOND FORD
LINCOLN, AAA; FORD MANUFACTURER; UNION BANK & TRUST; JOHN
ASBURY, CEO; JOHN STALLINGS, President; DMV COMMISSIONERS;
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; KEITH M. YACKO;
MCMICHAEL TAYLOR GRAY, LLC; NATIONAL SERVICING CENTER;
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; J. SARGEANT REYNOLDS; VCU;
HENRICO & VA COURTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00163-JAG)
Submitted: December 31, 2020 Decided: February 10, 2021
Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tacitus Anastacius Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Tacitus Anastacius Hall appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hall v. Anderson, No. 3:20-cv-00163-JAG (E.D. Va.
May 18 & 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.