The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1796•Emmanuel Edokobi v. Suntrust Bank
20-1796Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1796
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK; ASSOCIATED CREDIT SERVICES, INC.; ANDREW B.
ROBINSON; JASON NEEL; ENEE I. VINIK; DONNA WILSON; ALFRED
LETENDRE; CHRISTINE MONTECALVO,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01071-PWG)
Submitted: March 23, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
Before KING, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Emmanuel Edokobi, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew A. Egeli, EGELI LAW FIRM, PLLC,
Staunton, Virginia; Manuel Harry Newburger, BARRON & NEWBURGER PC, Austin,
Texas, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Edokobi appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions
for summary judgment and denying relief on Edokobi’s civil complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Edokobi v. SunTrust Bank, No. 8:19-cv-01071-PWG (D. Md. July 22, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.