The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1827•Henri Jean-Baptiste v. Montgomery County Department of Corrections; State’s Attorney’s Office of Maryland
20-1827Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 7, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1827
HENRI JEAN-BAPTISTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STATE’S
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-03009-PWG)
Submitted: March 30, 2021 Decided: April 7, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henri Jean-Baptiste, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henri Jean-Baptiste appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Jean-Baptiste v. Montgomery Cnty. Dep’t of
Corr., No. 8:17-cv-03009-PWG (D. Md. July 17, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.