The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1880•ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., a/k/a Ross A. Fiorani, Jr. v. Capital One Financial Corporation
20-1880Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1880
ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., a/k/a Ross A. Fiorani, Jr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION; CAPITAL ONE AUTO
FINANCE, INC., Corp. Ofc. Jane & John Does 1-25; LINDSAY AUTOMOTIVE
GROUP, d/b/a Lindsay CJD & Ram, a/k/a John Does X, Y, & Z; GREENWOOD
RECOVERY, INCORPORATED; LEESBURG AUTO IMPORT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell III, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02456-GLR)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: August 24, 2021
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa Destime, Edward Hutchinson Robbins,
Jr., MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint against Lindsay Automotive Group (“Lindsay”) for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction, dismissing the remaining defendants for lack of service, and denying his
motions to appoint counsel and for discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Fiorani’s
request for sanctions, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Fiorani v. Cap. One Fin. Corp., No. 1:19-cv-02456-GLR (D. Md. July 20, 2020). We also
deny Lindsay’s motion to strike a pleading filed by Fiorani. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.