The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1933•In re: Christina M. Vogt
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1933
In re: CHRISTINA M. VOGT,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (3:20-cv-00122-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: November 19, 2020 Decided: November 23, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christina M. Vogt, Petitioner Pro Se. Joseph Umberto Leonoro, STEPTOE & JOHNSON
PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christina M. Vogt petitions for a writ of prohibition, seeking an order from this
court remanding her removed civil action back to West Virginia state court and awarding
her $5,000 in costs and damages.
A writ of prohibition is a “drastic and extraordinary remedy which should be granted
only when the petitioner has shown h[er] right to the writ to be clear and undisputable and
that the actions of the court were a clear abuse of discretion.” In re Vargas, 723 F.2d 1461,
1468 (10th Cir. 1983). A writ of prohibition may not be used as a substitute for appeal.
Id. The relief sought by Vogt is not available by way of prohibition.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of prohibition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.