The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1962•Shawnta D. Royster v. LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General; MARY KEARNEY, Postmaster; CARL W. STARLIPER, Supervisor
20-1962Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 26, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1962
SHAWNTA D. ROYSTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General; MARY KEARNEY, Postmaster; CARL W.
STARLIPER, Supervisor,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, former Attorney General; STEPHEN
SCHENNING, Acting U.S. Attorney; MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Former Postmaster
General,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02495-GLR)
Submitted: January 15, 2021 Decided: January 26, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Shawnta D. Royster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Shawnta D. Royster appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment
discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Royster v.
DeJoy, No. 1:17-cv-02495-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.