The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1966•William A. Taccino v. Edmund J. Taccino
20-1966Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1966
WILLIAM A. TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDMUND J. TACCINO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:20-cv-02160-GLR)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: August 5, 2021
Before FLOYD, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Taccino, No. 1:20-cv-
02160-GLR (D. Md. filed Aug. 6, 2020 & entered Aug. 7, 2020). We deny Taccino’s
motions objecting to the validity of the briefing order and to remand this case to the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.