The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2059•Carla T. Lewis v. Oscar Navarro; Wells Fargo Bank Na
20-2059Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2059
CARLA T. LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OSCAR NAVARRO; WELLS FARGO BANK NA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00590-MHL)
Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 24, 2021
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carla T. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. John Curtis Lynch, TROUTMAN PEPPER
HAMILTON SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carla T. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil
complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Lewis v. Navarro, No. 3:20-cv-00590-MHL (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2020). We
further deny Lewis’ “motion to stable probate.” We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.