The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2065•Judameyre L. McRae v. Niagara Bottling; Melanie Calkins; Greg Banks
20-2065Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2065
JUDAMEYRE L. MCRAE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NIAGARA BOTTLING; MELANIE CALKINS; GREG BANKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00149-KDB-DCK)
Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judameyre L. McRae, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Judameyre L. McRae appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint for lack of subject matter and diversity jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. McRae v. Niagara Bottling, No. 5:20-cv-00149-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct.
5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* McRae does not challenge the district court’s determination that it did not have
federal question jurisdiction over his complaint. Therefore, McRae has forfeited appellate
review of this determination. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.