The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2108•In re: Antonio Marco Herrera
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2108
In re: ANTONIO MARCO HERRERA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (1:19-cv-01301-LO-JFA)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Marco Herrera, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Marco Herrera, a Virginia inmate, petitions this court for a writ of error
coram nobis. In his petition, Herrera challenges this court’s September 29, 2020 decision
dismissing as interlocutory his appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion to
appoint counsel in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. See Herrera v. Clarke, 823 F.
App’x 210, 211 (4th Cir. 2020) (No. 20-6481).
We conclude that Herrera fails to establish that he is entitled to a writ of error coram
nobis. See United States v. Akinsade, 686 F.3d 248, 252 (4th Cir. 2012) (identifying
requirements for issuance of writ). Accordingly, we deny his petition. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.