The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2126•Marcus C. Gaskins v. PHIL HAGER, Director of the Office of Planning
20-2126Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2126
MARCUS C. GASKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PHIL HAGER, Director of the Office of Planning and Zoning; GREGORIO
AFRICA, Director of the Department of Inspections and Permits; SHERRI
DICKERSON, Director of the Office of Personnel,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01977-SAG)
Submitted: May 25, 2021 Decided: May 27, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus C. Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marcus C. Gaskins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion
to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Having reviewed the record and finding no reversible error, we affirm
the decision of the district court. Gaskins v. Hager, No. 1:20-cv-01977-SAG (D. Md. Sept.
18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.