The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2147•Rashad Ranzy v. Crumley Roberts, Llp
20-2147Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2147
RASHAD RANZY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRUMLEY ROBERTS, LLP,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00477-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: October 27, 2021 Decided: November 17, 2021
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rashad Ranzy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rashad Ranzy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ranzy v. Crumley Roberts LLP, No. 3:20-cv-00477-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sept. 25,
2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.