The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2214•Marion Wilson v. Montgomery County; Michael Nesselt; Angela Washington
20-2214Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 7, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2214
MARION WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY; MICHAEL NESSELT; ANGELA WASHINGTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Gina Simms, Magistrate Judge. (8:18-cv-03707-GLS)
Submitted: January 31, 2022 Decided: February 7, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marion Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Pemble Hansen, Edward B. Lattner, John Paul
Markovs, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marion Wilson appeals the magistrate judge’s orders granting Defendants’ motion
to dismiss Wilson’s civil action challenging the termination of his employment and
denying Wilson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.* We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Wilson v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:18-cv-03707-GLS (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2020 & Nov. 10,
2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.