The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6044•United States of America v. Christopher Junior Randall, a/k/a Chris
20-6044Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6044
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR RANDALL, a/k/a Chris,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00583-TLW-1)
Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Junior Randall, Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher J. Randall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion
seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
§ 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randall,
No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2019). We deny Randall’s motion for the
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.