The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6115•Chauncey Bennett v. Warden Ricky Foxwell of E.c.i.
20-6115Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 14, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6115
CHAUNCEY BENNETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN RICKY FOXWELL OF E.C.I.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Baltimore, at Maryland.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00105-JKB)
Submitted: July 20, 2020 Decided: August 14, 2020
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Defendant in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Bennett v. Warden, Rick Foxwell, No. 1:19-cv-00105-JKB (D.
Md. Jan. 9, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.