The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6119•Tyrone Peele v. Jack A. Williford
20-6119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 13, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6119
TYRONE PEELE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JACK A. WILLIFORD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00229-D)
Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: August 13, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Peele, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Peele appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We
therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peele v. Williford, No. 5:19-
cv-00229-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.