Robbie Collins v. Warden Stephan

20-6160Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2020

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6160
ROBBIE COLLINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN STEPHAN; A/W WASHINGTON; NURSE WERRE; NURSE LEE;
NURSE COURTNEY OLDS; NURSE COOPER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-03282-RMG)
Submitted: October 30, 2020 Decided: December 17, 2020
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robbie Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN, DAVIS &
HUGHES, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Alexander Erwin Davis, Lacey Lee Houghton,
Skyler Cole Wilson, COPELAND, STAIR, KINGMA & LOVELL, LLP, Charleston,
South Carolina; Amy Lynn Neuschafer, COLLINS & LACY, P.C., Murrells Inlet, South
Carolina; Robert McNair Peele, III, COLLINS & LACY, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Robbie Collins appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny the motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
and magistrate judge. See Collins v. Stephan, No. 9:18-cv-03282-RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 16,
2020; Nov. 6, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.