The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6240•United States of America v. Richard Brent Kennedy
20-6240Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6240
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICHARD BRENT KENNEDY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-mj-00114-TCB-LMB-1)
Submitted: January 26, 2021 Decided: February 9, 2021
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel A. Harvill, DANIEL A. HARVILL, PLLC, Manassas, Virginia, for Appellant. G.
Zachary Terwilliger, United States Attorney, Viviana Vasiu, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Brent Kennedy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion
objecting to the magistrate judge’s denial of his petition to expunge his criminal record.
The district court found no extraordinary circumstances supporting expungement. We
conclude, however, that federal ancillary jurisdiction does not extend to petitions for
equitable expungement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375,
379-81 (1994); see also Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 2010) (recognizing that
“[e]very federal appellate court has a special obligation to satisfy itself not only of its own
jurisdiction, but also that of the lower courts in a cause under review” (internal quotation
marks omitted)).
Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand this matter to the
district court with instructions to dismiss Kennedy’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.