The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6253•Charles A. Williams v. Linette Jordan
20-6253Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6253
CHARLES A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LINETTE JORDAN,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
SGT. SCHULTIZ; C/O JORDAN; C/O SPELLER; SGT. RIDDLEY; VICTOR
SHULTIS; RICHARD SPELLER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03091-BO)
Submitted: September 23, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting a default judgment
in his favor with respect to one of the named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action,
and awarding Williams $10,000 in compensatory damages but denying his request for
punitive damages. We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the hearing on
damages as against Defendant Jordan, and we find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly,
we affirm. Williams v. Jordan, No. 5:14-ct-03091-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2019). We deny
Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.