The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6257•Anthony Fred Martin v. Assistant Warden Gregory Washington
20-6257Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6257
ANTHONY FRED MARTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ASSISTANT WARDEN GREGORY WASHINGTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:18-cv-00187-DCN)
Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 26, 2021
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN, DAVIS &
HUGHES, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Martin’s amended 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin
v. Washington, No. 4:18-cv-00187-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 22 & Feb. 6, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.