The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6316•Jason Bolden v. Rex Blocker; Anne Elizabeth Cuccio
20-6316Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6316
JASON BOLDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REX BLOCKER; ANNE ELIZABETH CUCCIO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (9:18-cv-03473-DCC)
Submitted: September 28, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Bolden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jason Bolden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to Appellees, and dismissing without
prejudice Bolden’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. Blocker, No. 9:18-cv-03473-
DCC (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.