The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6353•Damian Inman v. Sally J. Boss; Linda Foley
20-6353Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 7, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6353
DAMIAN INMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SALLY J. BOSS; LINDA FOLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:18-cv-02155-JMC)
Submitted: December 4, 2020 Decided: January 7, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief, Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damian Inman, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY FIRM, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Damian Inman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to
prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny the pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Inman
v. Boss, No. 5:18-cv-02155-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.