The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6385•Khemall Jokhoo v. LOLA VELAQUEZ-AGUILU, Assistant U.S. Attorney
20-6385Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6385
KHEMALL JOKHOO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOLA VELAQUEZ-AGUILU, Assistant U.S. Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03125-FL)
Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khemall Jokhoo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Khemall Jokhoo appeals the district court’s order construing his complaint as an
action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and dismissing it under 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Jokhoo v. Velaquez-Aguilu, No. 5:19-ct-03125-FL (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.