The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6486•Clayton T. Jones v. Officer Chris E. Odom
20-6486Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6486
CLAYTON T. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER CHRIS E. ODOM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:19-cv-03326-TMC)
Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clayton T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clayton T. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2018). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones
v. Odom, No. 3:19-cv-03326-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.