The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6548•David A. Gambino v. Warden, of F.C.I. Gilmer
20-6548Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6548
DAVID A. GAMBINO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, of F.C.I. Gilmer,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00043-JPB)
Submitted: October 30, 2020 Decided: November 24, 2020
Before KING, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Gambino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David A. Gambino, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Gambino’s
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Gambino challenged the conditions of his confinement.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Gambino v. Warden, No. 5:20-cv-00043-JPB (N.D.W.
Va. Apr. 8, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.