The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6705•Sathrie Robinson v. DR. MATTHEW CARPENTER, M.D., in their individual capacity
20-6705Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 29, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6705
SATHRIE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. MATTHEW CARPENTER, M.D., in their individual capacity; DR. BELAY
TESSEMA, M.D., in their individual capacity; DR. NIMELY CONTAH, M.D., in
their individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00801-SAG)
Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sathrie Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sathrie Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Carpenter, No. 1:20-cv-
00801-SAG (D. Md. Apr. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.