The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6716•Derek Lamar Tompkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia
20-6716Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 27, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6716
DEREK LAMAR TOMPKINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00099-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 27, 2020
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Lamar Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek Lamar Tompkins appeals the district court’s order denying his application
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition because
he failed to pay the $5 filing fee. Our review of the record shows that Tompkins paid the
filing fee before the district court dismissed his petition. Accordingly, we vacate the
district court’s order and remand for further proceedings.∗ We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
∗ We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. See Harbison v. Bell, 556
U.S. 180, 183 (2009).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.