The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6758•Gregory Simmons-Bey, a/k/a Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey v. NANCY MCFARLAND, City of Raleigh
20-6758Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6758
GREGORY SIMMONS-BEY, a/k/a Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NANCY MCFARLAND, City of Raleigh; CHRISTOPHER A. MACKAY; RISK
MANAGEMENT DIVISION; DOROTHY K. LEAPLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03297-D)
Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 20, 2020
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Simmons-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Simmons-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Simmons-Bey v. McFarland, No. 5:19-ct-03297-D (E.D. Va. May 15, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.