The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6784•Edrian Donyae Wright, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
20-6784Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 28, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6784
EDRIAN DONYAE WRIGHT, a/k/a Yae, a/k/a Yaeyo,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (0:20-cv-00216-TMC-PJG)
Submitted: September 15, 2020 Decided: October 28, 2020
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edrian Donyae Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edrian Donyae Wright appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. South Carolina Dep’t of
Corr., No. 0:20-cv-00216-TMC-PJG (D.S.C. May 4, 2020). We deny Wright’s motion for
costs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.