The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6793•Jonathan Allen v. Warden D. L. Young
20-6793Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 27, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6793
JONATHAN ALLEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN D. L. YOUNG,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:18-cv-01463)
Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 27, 2020
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Allen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Allen, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Allen’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition in which Allen raised a due process challenge to a prison disciplinary proceeding.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Young, No. 5:18-cv-01463 (S.D.W. Va. May
13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.