United States of America v. Alan Peter Darcy, a/k/a Alan D’arcy, a/k/a Irish Darcy

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6847
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALAN PETER DARCY, a/k/a Alan D’arcy, a/k/a Irish Darcy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cr-00036-MR-WCM-1)
Submitted: December 14, 2020 Decided: February 10, 2021
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan Peter Darcy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Alan Peter Darcy appeals the district court’s orders denying his pro se “Emergency
Motion” and his subsequent counseled motion to strike. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Darcy, No. 1:17-cr-00036-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 26
& 27, 2020); see also United States v. Janati, 374 F.3d 263, 273 (4th Cir. 2004)
(recognizing district courts’ “wide-ranging control over management of their dockets”).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --