The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6898•United States of America v. Steven Sakaski Robinson, a/k/a Worm
20-6898Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6898
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN SAKASKI ROBINSON, a/k/a Worm,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-01322-TLW-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2020 Decided: November 24, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Sakaski Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Sakaski Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
a reduction of his sentence pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
§ 404, 32 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Robinson, No. 4:06-cr-01322-TLW-1 (D.S.C. June 2, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.